Cases 1 - 10 of 1,361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Moore v. Officer Finley et al
as 2:2023cv01654
Plaintiff:
Michael Moore
Defendant:
Officer Finley, Officer Moise, Officer Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blakes v. Vespa et al
as 1:2023cv01379
Plaintiff:
Rev Blakes
Defendant:
John P Vespa, Dave Gast, Brenda McCavitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Gast
as 1:2023cv01338
Petitioner:
Torlando Dontae McDonald
Respondent:
David Gast
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GAST v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv14725
Plaintiff:
JOHN GAST
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Courthouse News Service et al v. Gast et al
as 4:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Courthouse News Service and Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
Robert Gast and Anne Sheeley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 vc Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
RICHARDSON-BEY v. SHELTON et al
as 1:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
LEROY RICHARDSON-BEY
Defendant:
WARDEN M. SHELTON, SGT. WATSON, WARDEN BRAYBOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Doe No 19-3251 v. Chier Intake Jonathan Gast, et al
as 23-55006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOE NO 19-3251
Defendant / Appellee:
CHIER INTAKE JONATHAN GAST, FHEO, CITY OF LOS ANGELES and others
John Doe No 19-3251 v. Jonathan Gast et al
as 2:2022cv09273
Plaintiff:
John Doe No 19-3251
Defendant:
Chier Intake Jonathan Gast, FHEO, City of Los Angeles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
