Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Warren v. Genpak LLC
as 2:2020cv14378
Defendant:
Genpak LLC
Plaintiff:
Wendy Warren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0451
McNeal et al v. Genpak, LLC et al (MAG+)
as 2:2020cv00197
Plaintiff:
Tonya McNeal and Cedrick Grandison
Defendant:
Kathy Sawchuk and Genpak, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Evergreen Partnering Group, et al v. Pactiv Corporation, et al
as 15-1839
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EVERGREEN PARTNERING GROUP, INC. and MICHAEL FORREST
Defendant - Appellee:
PACTIV CORPORATION, SOLO CUP COMPANY, a corporation, DOLCO PACKAGING, a Tekni-Plex Company, a corporation and others
Defendant:
GENPAK, LLC, a/k/a Genpack, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00140
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00860
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv01228
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2013cv01947
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Evergreen Partnering Group v. Pactiv Corporation, et al
as 12-1730
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EVERGREEN PARTNERING GROUP, INC.
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FORREST
Defendant - Appellee:
PACTIV CORPORATION, GENPAK, LLC, a/k/a Genpack, LLC, SOLO CUP COMPANY, a corporation and others
Defendant:
POLYSTYRENE FOODSERVICE PACKAGING GROUP, a business group within the American Chemistry Council
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
