Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
FREEMAN v. MARCHIONNE
as 1:2015cv01799
Plaintiff:
LEWIS GENE FREEMAN
Defendant:
SERGIO MARCHIONNE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Delahoussaye et al v. Premo Stallone, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv00021
Plaintiff:
Dorothy W. Delahoussaye and Toby A. Delahoussaye
Defendant:
Premo Stallone, Inc. and Gene Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv02741
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry Freeman v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 11-11016
Petitioner - Appellant:
TERRY GENE FREEMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Terry Freeman v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 09-11125
Petitioner - Appellant:
TERRY GENE FREEMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Terry Freeman v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 09-55
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
TERRY GENE FREEMAN
Defendant - Respondent:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Terry Freeman v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 09-10922
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY GENE FREEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Freeman v. Quarterman
as 07-10975
Petitioner - Appellant:
TERRY GENE FREEMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Freeman v. Quarterman
as 4:2007cv00176
Petitioner:
Terry Gene Freeman
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
