Cases filed in District of Columbia
ATCHLEY et al v. ASTRAZENECA UK LIMITED et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv02136
Plaintiff: AMY RITCHIE, BRENDA CHAND, JEAN DAMMANN and others
Defendant: JANSSEN ORTHO LLC, PFIZER PHARMACEUTICALS LLC, ETHICON, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2331
IN RE SUBPOENA TO PING WANG et al v. GENENTECH, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016mc02016
Plaintiff: PHIGENIX, INC.
Defendant: GENENTECH, INC.
Cause Of Action: MS:MiscOrd
CENTOCOR ORTHO BIOTECH, INC. v. GENENTECH, INC. et al
as 1:2010mc00278
Plaintiff: CENTOCOR ORTHO BIOTECH, INC.
Defendant: GENENTECH, INC. and CITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: Motion to Enforce Subpoena
GENENTECH, INC. v. KAPPOS
as 1:2010cv00496
Plaintiff: GENENTECH, INC.
Defendant: DAVID KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
GENENTECH, INC. v. DOLL
as 1:2009cv01265
Plaintiff: GENENTECH, INC. and GENENTECH, INC.
Defendant: JOHN J. DOLL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Type: Other Statutes None
GENENTECH, INC. v. DOLL
as 1:2009cv00907
Plaintiff: GENENTECH, INC.
Defendant: JOHN J. DOLL
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Type: Other Statutes None
GENENTECH, INC. v. DOLL
as 1:2009cv00838
Plaintiff: GENENTECH, INC.
Defendant: JOHN J. DOLL
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Type: Other Statutes None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?