Cases 1 - 10 of 103
Cox v. Armstrong et al
as 4:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Barry Lynn Cox
Defendant:
Kenneth Armstrong, Eric Gentry, K. Jake Graff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gentry, et al v. CIR
as 23-9003
Petitioner / Appellant:
IRA W. GENTRY and LYNN M. GENTRY
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Gentry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 4:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gentry
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Reed v. Northeast New Mexico Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2023cv00322
Plaintiff:
Kevin B Reed
Defendant:
Northeast New Mexico Correctional Facility, Summit Foods and Mark Gentry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
United States v. Gentry
as 23-3030
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TRUMAN GENTRY
Ezell v. Hininger, et al
as 23-7007
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES RICKY EZELL, III
Defendant / Appellee:
DAMON HININGER, CEO of Core Civic, JAMES YATES, Warden, Davis Correctional Facility, DEPUTY WARDEN GENTRY and others
Hooks v. Blocker et al
as 6:2022cv00378
Plaintiff:
Antonio Dewayne Hooks
Defendant:
Blocker, Joe Norwood, Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gentry v. Rosenlund
as 22-4075
Petitioner / Appellant:
IRA WILLIE GENTRY, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
JEFFREY H. ROSENLUND
Ezell v. Hininger, et al
as 22-7024
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES RICKY EZELL, III
Defendant / Appellee:
DAMON HININGER, CEO of Core Civic, JAMES YATES, Warden, Davis Correctional Facility, DEPUTY WARDEN GENTRY and others
Gentry v. Rosenlund
as 2:2022cv00361
Petitioner:
Ira Willie Gentry, Jr
Respondent:
Jeffrey H. Rosenlund
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
