Cases 21 - 30 of 2,386
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00736
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Gentry Carrier v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10161
Petitioner:
GENTRY GERAURD CARRIER
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gentry, James v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 0:2024cv60115
Plaintiff:
James Gentry
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gentry v. Maxey
as 24-20021
Plaintiff:
James H. Gentry
Defendant:
E. Maxey, Officer, A. Oliver, Officer and Bryan Collier
Gentry v. Rincones et al
as 9:2023cv07045
Plaintiff:
Rex A. Gentry
Defendant:
Paul Daniel Rincones and National OnDemand, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Johnson v. Boykins et al
as 2:2023cv02803
Plaintiff:
Justin T. Johnson
Defendant:
K. Boykins, Off. Bailey, D.R.T. Off. Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Gentry
as 23-20616
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Willie Gentry
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Kim v. Sheriff Matt Gentry et al
as 5:2023cv01740
Petitioner:
Mung Sian Kim
Respondent:
Sheriff Matt Gentry and Judge Martha Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gentry et al v. Memphis Bell Transportation, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00475
Plaintiff:
Shawn Gentry, Hoa Nguyen, Thao Nguyen and others
Defendant:
Memphis Bell Transportation, LLC and Robinson Property Group, LLC doing business as Horseshoe Tunica
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
