Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2025cv00112
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Luster v. Garza et al
as 6:2025cv00084
Plaintiff:
George Daniel Luster, Jr.
Defendant:
Henry Garza, Sean K. Proctor, Adam Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luster v. Jas et al
as 5:2024cv00235
Defendant:
Daniel Pacheco, Angela D. Bratcher, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Plaintiff:
George Daniel Luster, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luster v. Jas et al
as 2:2024cv00222
Defendant:
Daniel Pacheco, Angela D. Bratcher, Cindy M. Mayo and others
Plaintiff:
George Daniel Luster, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGavitt v. The United States of America
as 4:2024cv02994
Petitioner:
George Daniel McGavitt
Respondent:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
George Luster, Jr.In re: George Luster, Jr.
as 24-50594
Petitioner:
In re: George Daniel Luster, Jr.
Luster v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00387
Petitioner:
George Daniel Luster, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCarthy et al v. Exactech Inc et al
as 1:2024cv04892
Plaintiff:
George Daniel McCarthy and Congresswoman Carolyn McCarthy
Defendant:
Exactech U.S., Inc. and Exactech Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Daniels v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01165
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic U.S.A., Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff:
George Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
George Ford v. Larry Brown, et al
as 24-1378
Plaintiff:
GEORGE DANIEL FORD
Defendant:
LARRY BROWN, Emergency Management Section (EMS) and DEREK GOWDY, Sergeant, JFC - Security Threat Group (STG) Coordinator
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
