Cases 1 - 10 of 235
v. Marshall et al
as 3:2025cv00206
Plaintiff:
George Lee Marshall, Jr
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Correction, Heidi Steward, IC Correciton Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
United States of America v. Lee
as 1:2025at00079
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
George Lee, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
United States of America v. Lee, Jr.
as 1:2025mc00005
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
George Lee, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
George Lee Cole et al v. California Department of Corrections Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2025cv00854
Plaintiff:
George Lee Cole, Jr.
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections Rehabilitation, Solis, Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tucker v. Gaddis
as 25-40033
Plaintiff:
George Lee Tucker, II
Defendant:
Steve Gaddis, Don Lacey, Akbar Shabbazz and others
McGhee v. Fitch
as 3:2024cv00542
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Lynn Fitch
Plaintiff:
George Lee McGhee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Culbertson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv05667
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
George Lee Culbertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Blair v. Harris Teeter et al

as 3:2024cv03126
Defendant:
North Carolina Industrial Commission, Terry Rogers, Ace American Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Rodrick Blair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
McGhee v. Fitch
as 3:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
George Lee McGhee
Defendant:
Lynn Fitch
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans Jr. v. VADOC
as 1:2024cv00551
Petitioner:
George Lee Evans Jr.
Respondent:
VADOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.