Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Huntington Distribution Finance, Inc. v. Palm Isle Marine LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01500
Plaintiff:
Huntington Distribution Finance, Inc.
Defendant:
Palm Isle Marine LLC and George Stephen Petty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
George Cunningham v. Michael Burgess
as 23-1986
Petitioner / Appellant:
GEORGE STEPHEN CUNNINGHAM
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL BURGESS
KALIORAS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19602
Plaintiff:
GEORGE STEPHEN KALIORAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
STEPHENS v. BULLARD et al
as 1:2021cv00054
Defendant:
OFFICER KERTSETTER, LIEUTENENT BULLARD and OFFICER MORENO
Plaintiff:
GEORGE STEPHENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENSLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv36699
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE STEPHEN HENSLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STEPHENS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv07816
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE STEPHENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stephens v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2018cv00080
Petitioner:
Christopher George Stephens
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stephens et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2017cv02191
Plaintiff:
George Stephens and Gayle M. Stephens
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc and Thomas P Schmalzried
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Browning et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv06127
Plaintiff:
George Stephen Browning and Michelle Browning
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc. and Pharmacia & Upjohn Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Datz v. Warren et al
as 1:2015cv04315
Plaintiff:
George Stephen Datz
Defendant:
Neal Warren, David Howe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
