Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Canada v. Osumdson et al

as 4:2025cv04078
Plaintiff:
Jon Canada
Defendant:
. Osumdson, . Mills, Paula Lodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andre Winston v. Elizabeth Schmidt, et al
as 25-1444
Plaintiff:
ANDRE WINSTON
Defendant:
ELIZABETH SCHMIDT, TDF Staff, SHAN JUMPER, B.C. Member and Clinical Director, GERALD CARREON, B.C. Member and Team Leader and others
Sullivan v. Carreon et al
as 4:2024cv04152
Defendant:
Gerald Carreon, Eleanor Schupick, Nicole Velez and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Carreon et al
as 4:2024cv04109
Defendant:
Courtney Rhoades, Cora Bezold, Nicole Velez and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Sullivan v. Gerald Carreon, et al
as 24-1246
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SULLIVAN
Defendant:
GERALD CARREON, ELANOR SCHUPICK, CORA BEZOLD and others
Speagle v. Donathan et al
as 4:2023cv04148
Plaintiff:
Billy A Speagle
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, Liberty Healthcare Corporation, Shan Jumper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Jumper et al
as 4:2023cv04059
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sullivan
Defendant:
Shan Jumper, Gerald Carreon, Sandra Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Speagle v. Liberty Healthcare Corporation et al
as 4:2023cv04027
Plaintiff:
Billy A Speagle
Defendant:
Liberty Healthcare Corporation, Greg Donathan, Shan Jumper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCray v. WaterKotte et al

as 4:2023cv04015
Plaintiff:
Leonardo McCray
Defendant:
Cody Water Uotte, Shane Jumper, Gerald Carreon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry Berry v. Shan Jumper, et al
as 21-1151
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRY L. BERRY
Defendant / Appellee:
GERALD CARREON, CHRISTINA WOODS, SHAN JUMPER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.