Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Lofton v. Lashbrook et al
as 3:2017cv00948
Petitioner:
Gerald Lofton
Respondent:
Jacqueline Lashbrook and Attorney General, State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jenkins et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2017cv03823
Plaintiff:
Ollie A. Jenkins and Gerald Lofton
Defendant:
General Motors L.L.C. , John Does Inc. and John Doe's
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lofton v. Akpore et al
as 4:2017cv04100
Plaintiff:
Gerald Lofton
Defendant:
Kevwe Akpore, Donald Stolworthy, Brian D. Cannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00099
Plaintiff:
Ollie A. Jenkins and Gerald Lofton
Defendant:
General Motors LLC , John Does Inc. and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BANKS v. REALTY COUNSELING COMPANY, et al.
as 2:2013cv01025
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
REALTY COUNSELING COMPANY, JIM SPROUT, CASE MANAGER ANESBURG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Realty Counseling Company et al
as 1:2013cv01784
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Realty Counseling Company, Jim Sprout, Anesburg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Thompson et al
as 4:2013cv00382
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Thompson, Price, Fitzgerald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Anesburg et al
as 1:2013cv01621
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Anesburg, Mary McCollum, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lofton v. Zickefoose
as 1:2012cv07320
Plaintiff:
GERALD LOFTON
Defendant:
DONNA ZICKEFOOSE, Fritzgerald, Monticello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lofton v. Zickefoose
as 1:2012cv07409
Plaintiff:
Gerald Lofton
Defendant:
Donna Zickefoose, Fritzgerald, Monticello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
