Cases 1 - 10 of 222
Kherer v. Giant Eagle, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01211
Defendant:
John Does 1-30, Investment and Administrative Committee and Giant Eagle, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Kherer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
In re: Giant Eagle Inc v. Pfizer Inc, et al
as 24-2189
Defendant:
WARNER LAMBERT CO LLC, PFIZER INC, RANBAXY INC and others
Unknown:
In re: LIPITOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
GIANT EAGLE INC
Z View Enterprises LLC, et al v. Giant Eagle Inc
as 24-2041
Plaintiff:
OCH SUPERMARKETS LLC, THROCKMORTON SUPERMARKETS INC, PENN SUPERMARKETS LLC and others
Defendant:
GIANT EAGLE INC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
PHOENIX INTANGIBLES HOLDING COMPANY et al v. NATURES EAGLE LLC,
as 2:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
PHOENIX INTANGIBLES HOLDING COMPANY and GIANT EAGLE, INC.
Defendant:
NATURES EAGLE LLC, and NATURE'S EAGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Robertson v. Taylor et al
as 1:2023cv00891
Plaintiff:
Melvin Robertson
Defendant:
Officer Robert Taylor, City of Cleveland and Giant Eagle, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00852
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
