Cases 1 - 10 of 140
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv01438
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183 Patent Non-Infringement- Right to Compensation
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv01391
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv01370
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv01346
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv01158
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv01107
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 24-1995
Defendant:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Plaintiff:
GILBERT P. HYATT
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 24-1992
Defendant:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Plaintiff:
GILBERT P. HYATT
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 24-1993
Plaintiff:
GILBERT P. HYATT
Defendant:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 24-1994
Defendant:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Plaintiff:
GILBERT P. HYATT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
