Cases 1 - 9 of 9
SCOTT v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2021cv20090
Plaintiff:
GLENDA SCOTT
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MCKESSON CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCOTT v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 3:2021cv15099
Plaintiff:
GLENDA SCOTT
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MCKESSON CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OPATRNY et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 3:2018cv15984
Plaintiff:
EARL BLACKSTOCK, PAMELA BLUNT, VIRGINIA FERNANDES and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK & CO., INC. and MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Osborn Scott, et al
as 11-30211
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, on behalf of Farm Service Agency, formerly known as Farmers Home Administration
Defendant - Appellant:
ALVANIA DEXTER SCOTT, FRED WASHINGTON, OSBORN SCOTT, JR. and others
USA v. Scott (deceased) et al
as 1:2010cv00997
Defendant:
Osborn Scott, Alvania Dexter Scott, Fred Washington and others
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
HENNESY v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv60958
Plaintiff:
GLENDA SCOTT HENNESY
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION , CSX TRANSPORTATION , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Scott et al v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv00260
Plaintiff:
Glenda Scott and Floyd Scott
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
v. Scott et al
as 1:2009cv00259
Defendant:
Glenda Scott, Floyd Scott, Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Scott et al v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv00255
Plaintiff:
Glenda Scott and Floyd Scott
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
