Cases 1 - 10 of 103
Hayward v. Gonzalez
as 4:2024cv00385
Plaintiff:
Glenn Lee Hayward and Glen Lee Hayward
Defendant:
Chief Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Selden v. United States of America et al
as 8:2023cv02484
Plaintiff:
Glenn Lee Selden
Defendant:
United States of America, President Joseph Biden, Barrack Hussein Obama and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
I.D.R.S
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Selden v. United States et al
as 2:2023cv14199
Plaintiff:
Glenn Lee Selden
Defendant:
United States and U.S. Presidents
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
LANKFORD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17328
Plaintiff:
GLENN LEE LANKFORD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lee v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc et al
as 9:2022cv80674
Plaintiff:
Glenn Lee
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Warren v. SSA
as 5:2021cv00068
Plaintiff:
Glenn Lee Warren
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Selden v. O'Neil et al
as 8:2021cv00325
Respondent:
Patricia Ann Booth McCarthy and Robert E. O'Neil
Petitioner:
Glenn Lee Selden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
YOUNG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv68632
Plaintiff:
GLENN LEE YOUNG
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tribble v. Penzone et al
as 2:2020cv01103
Plaintiff:
Glenn Lee Tribble
Defendant:
Paul Penzone and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christensen et al v. The Boeing Company
as 1:2020cv01813
Plaintiff:
CHRISTENSEN, SUSAN CHRISTENSEN, Glenn Lee and others
Defendant:
The Boeing Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
