Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Globus Medical Inc. v. Sky Surgical et al
as 8:2023mc00019
Petitioner:
Globus Medical, Inc.
Respondent:
Keith Valentine and SeaSpine, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Globus Medical Inc.
Defendant:
Jay Jamison and Sky Surgical
Spinelogik, Inc. v. Globus Medical, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00529
Plaintiff:
Spinelogik, Inc.
Defendant:
Globus Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Globus Medical, Inc. v. Valentine et al
as 2:2023mc00165
Petitioner:
Globus Medical, Inc.
Respondent:
Keith Valentine and SeaSpine, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
SCHNEIDER et al v. GLOBUS MEDICAL, INC.
as 2:2022cv03299
Plaintiff:
CODY SCHNEIDER and JOSEPH JASKOLSKI
Defendant:
GLOBUS MEDICAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Medtronic, Inc. et al v. Kemp Stanford et al
as 8:2022cv01414
Plaintiff:
Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Kemp Stanford and Globus Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Globus Medical Inc. v. Jamison et al
as 2:2022cv00282
Plaintiff:
Globus Medical Inc.
Defendant:
Shane Jamison, Mike Ruane, Mike Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
GLOBUS MEDICAL INC. v. SKY SURGICAL et al
as 2:2022cv02626
Plaintiff:
GLOBUS MEDICAL INC.
Defendant:
SKY SURGICAL and JAY JAMISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
GLOBUS MEDICAL INC. v. SHARP et al
as 2:2022cv00383
Plaintiff:
GLOBUS MEDICAL INC.
Defendant:
EDWARD SHARP, ANDREW MILLER, BROOKE STEPHENS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
