Cases 31 - 40 of 32,431
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
USA v. Gonzalez-Barragan
as 24-40245
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Gregorio Gonzalez-Barragan
Ceres Global Advisory Inc. v. Gonzalez De Castilla
as 1:2024cv21415
Plaintiff:
Ceres Global Advisory Inc.
Defendant:
Miguel Gonzalez De Castilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Gonzalez v. Herrera, et al.
as 24-2371
Petitioner:
LEON ABEL GONZALEZ
Respondent:
JUAN HERRERA, Bureau of Prisons Residential Reentry Manager for Long Beach, in his official capacity and COLLETTE PETERS, Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, in her official capacity
READING COLLISION CENTER v. GONZALEZ
as 5:2024cv01576
Plaintiff:
READING COLLISION CENTER
Defendant:
SANDRA GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Benjamin Gonzalez v. Christian Pfeiffer
as 2:2024cv03147
Petitioner:
Benjamin Gonzalez
Respondent:
Christian Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez (PS) v. Austin et al
as 1:2024cv01015
Plaintiff:
Alfredo P. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Lloyd Austin, Burnes and Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Gonzalez et al
as 3:2024cv00703
Plaintiff:
Dashante Scott Jones
Defendant:
Gonzalez, Nordby, The Town of Newtown Connecticut and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
