Cases 11 - 20 of 39
BOGARD et al v. TIKTOK INC. et al
as 3:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
JOANN BOGARD, ANNIE MCGRATH, JANE DOE and others
Defendant:
TIKTOK INC., BYTEDANCE INC., ALPHABET INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marschke v. YouTube, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv02022
Plaintiff:
Brad Marschke
Defendant:
YouTube, LLC and Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Johnson et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01260
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Facebook Inc., YouTube, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Damian Jonhson and Damian Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Priest Butler v. Google, LLC, et al
as 22-2113
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PRIEST D. BUTLER
Defendant / Appellee:
GOOGLE, LLC, YOUTUBE LLC and ALPHABET INC.
Ali v. Ali et al
as 2:2022cv00641
Plaintiff:
Hussein Mawlid Ali
Defendant:
Hasna Mawlid Ali, Abdiihman Kalmoy, James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PFINGSTON v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION et al
as 3:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
HAROLD PFINGSTON
Defendant:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION and GOOGLE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
TAYLOR v. INDIANA GAMING COMMISSION et al
as 1:2021cv02659
Plaintiff:
EZEKIEL I. TAYLOR
Defendant:
INDIANA GAMING COMMISSION, SARA GONSO-TAIT, FACEBOOK LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Wilkerson v. World Health Organization, et al
as 21-2728
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL WILKERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, CENTER FOR DISEASE CONTROL, BILL GATES and others
Hopson, Benjamin et al v. Google, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00320
Plaintiff:
BlueType LLC, Benjamin Hopson, II and Gelbooru/Gelcom
Defendant:
Does 1-2 and Google, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Farwell v. Google, LLC
as 1:2021cv01122
Plaintiff:
Clinton Farwell
Defendant:
Google, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
