Cases 1 - 10 of 37
USA, et al v. Google LLC
as 24-5006
Plaintiff:
United States of America, State of Arkansas, State of Florida and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Other:
Brad Greenspan
HERRING NETWORKS, INC. v. GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2024mc00022
Respondent:
GOOGLE LLC
Petitioner:
HERRING NETWORKS, INC. doing business as ONE AMERICA NEWS NETWORK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
HELENA WORLD CHRONICLE, LLC v. GOOGLE LLC et al
as 1:2023cv03677
Plaintiff:
HELENA WORLD CHRONICLE, LLC
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC and ALPHABET INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2020cv03010
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Not Classified By Court:
STATE OF MICHIGAN and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
3Rd Party Defendant:
NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, COMCAST CORPORATION and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Petitioner:
AMAZON.COM, INC., APPLE INC., DUCK DUCK GO, INC. and others
Respondent:
BOOKING HOLDINGS INC. and YELP INC.
Interested Party:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR 2703(d) ORDER FOR ONE PHONE NUMBER SERVICED BY GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2023ml01232
In Re:
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR 2703(d) ORDER FOR ONE PHONE NUMBER SERVICED BY GOOGLE LLC
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BAKER v. GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2023cv02013
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA L. BAKER
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
GROOMS v. GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
JAMILAH N. GROOMS
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC doing business as YOUTUBE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
FOTOBOM MEDIA, INC. v. GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2022cv00712
Plaintiff:
FOTOBOM MEDIA, INC.
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
