Cases 1 - 10 of 31
HERRING NETWORKS, INC. v. GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2024mc00022
Respondent:
GOOGLE LLC
Petitioner:
HERRING NETWORKS, INC. doing business as ONE AMERICA NEWS NETWORK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
HELENA WORLD CHRONICLE, LLC v. GOOGLE LLC et al
as 1:2023cv03677
Plaintiff:
HELENA WORLD CHRONICLE, LLC
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC and ALPHABET INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
BAKER v. GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2023cv02013
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA L. BAKER
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR 2703(d) ORDER FOR ONE PHONE NUMBER SERVICED BY GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2023ml01232
In Re:
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR 2703(d) ORDER FOR ONE PHONE NUMBER SERVICED BY GOOGLE LLC
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
GROOMS v. GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
JAMILAH N. GROOMS
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC doing business as YOUTUBE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
SENSORY, INC. v. GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2022cv00937
Plaintiff:
SENSORY, INC.
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
FOTOBOM MEDIA, INC. v. GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2022cv00712
Plaintiff:
FOTOBOM MEDIA, INC.
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
NONPARTY SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM et al v. GOOGLE LLC et al
as 1:2021mc00038
Plaintiff:
VIDEOSHARE, LLC
Defendant:
YOUTUBE, LLC and GOOGLE LLC
In Re:
NONPARTY SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM
RAINTREE MEDICAL AND CHIROPRACTIC CENTER LLC v. FACEBOOK, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00658
Defendant:
ALPHABET INC., FACEBOOK, INC. and GOOGLE LLC
Plaintiff:
RAINTREE MEDICAL AND CHIROPRACTIC CENTER LLC and RODROCK CHIROPRACTIC PA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
KININ, INC. v. FACEBOOK, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00622
Defendant:
ALPHABET INC., GOOGLE LLC and FACEBOOK, INC.
Plaintiff:
KININ, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
