Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 154
Ditcharo et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv07399
Plaintiff: Cheryl Hernandez Ditcharo, Anthony Joseph Ditcharo, III, Gina Ditcharo Williams and others
Defendant: Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Entergy Louisiana, LLC, Union Pacific Railroad Company and others
Cross Defendant: The Manville Personal Injury Settlement Trust and Uniroyal Holding, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Deroche et al v. Anco Insulations, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv07179
Counter Defendant: Gerald Deroche and Sharon Deroche
Defendant: Anco Insulations, Inc., Cargill Incorporated, Geo P. Reintjes, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant: Eagle, Inc., Flowserve US, Inc., Gardner Denver, Inc. and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Mosaic Fertilizer LLC and Huntington Ingalls Incorporated
3Rd Party Defendant: Travelers Indemnity Company, Avon Products, Inc., Estee Lauder International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Brignac v. Anco Insulations, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv03124
Defendant: Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Bayer CropScience, Inc., Idex Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Percy Brignac
3Rd Party Defendant: Uniroyal Holding, Inc., Union Carbide Corporation, Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company and others
Cross Defendant: Goulds Pumps (IPG), Inc., Paramount Global and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Deroche et al v. Anco Insulations Inc et al
as 2:2023cv01415
Plaintiff: Gerald Deroche and Sharon Deroche
Defendant: Anco Insulations Inc, Eagle, Inc., Cargill Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
White v. Taylor Seidenbach, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00346
Plaintiff: Kelvin White
Defendant: Taylor Seidenbach, Inc., 3M, Goulds Pumps IPG, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Bridges et al v. Eagle Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04392
Plaintiff: Lloyd Bridges Sr., Lloyd Bridges Jr., Leonard Bridges III and others
Cross Defendant: Eagle Inc., Viacom CBS, Inc., International Paper Company and others
Defendant: Taylor Seidenbach, Inc., 3M Company, Goulds Pumps, Inc. and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Northrup Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc., Northrup Grumman Ship Systems, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant: Foster Wheeler LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Christiansen v. Federal Cartridge Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00232
Plaintiff: Lori Ann Christiansen
Defendant: Federal Cartridge Company, CBS Corporation, Industrial Holdings Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sanchez v. Anco Insulations, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv02973
Defendant: CBS Corporation, IDEX Corporation, International Paper Company and others
Cross Defendant: Champion International Corp., Pharmacia Corporation, Westinghouse Electric Company and others
Plaintiff: Elridge Joseph Sanchez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanchez v. Anco Insulations, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00325
Defendant: Grefco, Inc., John Crane, Inc., IDEX Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Elridge Joseph Sanchez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Borne v Anco Insulations, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00134
3Rd Party Defendant: Bayer Cropscience, LP, Manville Personal Injury Settlement Trust, CBS Corporation and others
Defendant: Crane Co., Ingersoll-Rand Company, The McCarty Corporation and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff: International Paper Company and Huntington Ingalls Incorporated f/k/a Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc.
Plaintiff: Rueben Borne and Reuben Borne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?