Cases 1 - 10 of 219
Doe LS 340, et al. v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al.
as 24-4145
Respondent:
JESSICA FRESHWATER, V.R., KELLY COWSERT and others
Petitioner:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER, LLC and RASIER-CA, LLC
Govan v. The State of New York
as 1:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Kwauhuru Govan
Defendant:
The State of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. EICKHOFF et al
as 1:2024cv04644
Plaintiff:
MARLON D. THOMPSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL EICKHOFF and SGT. GOVAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Govan v. Coastal Walls and Ceiling et al
as 4:2023cv06244
Plaintiff:
Duane Govan
Defendant:
Coastal Walls and Ceiling, John Does 1-10, William Arnold and others
Govan v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv05449
Plaintiff:
Marktez Govan
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Samuel et al v. Centene Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv01134
Plaintiff:
Harry Samuel, Christopher Robert Desmond and Arthur Govan
Defendant:
Centene Corporation, Centurion of Delaware LLC, VitalCore Health Strategies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00568
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOVAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv07565
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM GOVAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Ayers (Smith)
as 23-7119
Defendant:
DERRICK AYERS, BERMON CLARKE, NIA GOVAN and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMEL SMITH
Govan v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv13045
Plaintiff:
Toshiko Govan
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and Revlon Group Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
