Cases 1 - 10 of 147
FILING ERROR
as 1:2025cv00651
Defendant:
Nikoloas Salinas, TX Tint, LLC and Mitchell Govea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Salinas v. TX Tint, LLC et al
as 1:2025cv00652
Plaintiff:
Nikoloas Salinas
Defendant:
TX Tint, LLC and Mitchell Govea
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv01171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
(SS) Vazquez de Govea v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2025cv00127
Plaintiff:
Evelia Vazquez de Govea
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Balaji Govindaswami Govea v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 2:2025cv00651
Plaintiff:
Danita Govea
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Govea v. National Potato Promotion Board et al
as 1:2024cv11816
Defendant:
Lamb Weston, Inc., Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc., Cavendish Farms, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander Govea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Riggs et al v. Davis et al
as 3:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
Daniel Riggs and Bryan Harmer
Defendant:
Govea, Charles Daniels, Harroun and others
Interested Party:
Thomas Burdsal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavez-Govea v. Garland
as 24-9551
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
SIMON CHAVEZ-GOVEA
Govea v. USA
as 6:2024cv00042
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Pedro Govea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Delgado v. Raspberry et al
as 9:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Maria Delgado
Defendant:
Shelly Sitton, Tom Brown, Polk, County of and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
