Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRAHAM v. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE, (GAO)
as 2:2022cv02735
Plaintiff:
KEVINO W. GRAHAM
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE, (GAO)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Johnson v. Reece et al
as 2:2020cv12057
Defendant:
Daniel Reece, Gene L Dodario and GAO U.S. Government Accountability Office
Plaintiff:
Alina Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Frost v. US Congress et al
as 1:2020cv05652
Defendant:
Government Account Office, NYC MTA, R. Carpenito and others
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Frost
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1331
Gaines v. U. S. Government Accountability Office et al
as 1:2017cv02476
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Gaines
Defendant:
U. S. Government Accountability Office and Office of Inspector General
Gaines v. U. S. Government Accountability Office et al
as 1:2017mi00042
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Gaines
Defendant:
U. S. Government Accountability Office and Office of Inspector General
POND CONSTRUCTORS, INC. v. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
as 1:2017cv00881
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
Plaintiff:
POND CONSTRUCTORS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
ODEMNS v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2016cv01940
Plaintiff:
GEORGE LEE ODEMNS, III
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, ARCHITECT OF THE CAPITOL, UNITED STATES BOTANIC GARDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
