Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Wilbert v. The State of Texas et al
as 6:2022cv00769
Plaintiff:
JoAnn Wilbert
Defendant:
STATE OF TEXAS, Governor Greg Abbott, Governors Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00443
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ventress v. Abbott et al
as 5:2022cv00232
Plaintiff:
Chandler Kyle Ventress
Defendant:
Governor Greg Abbott, Warden Phonso Rayford and Director of TDCJ Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montes v. Abbott
as 5:2022cv00248
Plaintiff:
Abel Omar Montes
Defendant:
Governor Greg Abbott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00717
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Luevano v. Abbott et al
as 1:2021cv00286
Respondent:
Innocence Project of Austin Texas, Governor Greg Abbott, Criminal Court of Appeals, Austin, TX and others
Petitioner:
Jaime Luevano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01069
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Searcy v. Abbott et al
as 6:2019cv00684
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Texas Atty. General Greg Abbott and others
Plaintiff:
Harvey Lelane Searcy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smart v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2019cv00012
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Smart
Defendant:
Governor Greg Abbott, State of Texas and Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blaylark v. Abbott et al
as 1:2016cv01292
Defendant:
Governor Greg Abbott, Gary Bledsoe, JD, Appeals Court Judge Charles Campbell and others
Plaintiff:
Leslie Blaylark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
