Cases 51 - 60 of 76
Avdeef v. US Department of Justice et al
as 4:2021cv00451
Defendant:
Texas Governor Greg Abbott, Patrick W. Powers, Judge Don Cosby and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen M Avdeef
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00449
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Simpson v. Abbott et al
as 4:2021cv00146
Plaintiff:
Stephen O'Neil Simpson
Defendant:
Sharon Wilson and Governor Greg Abbott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brady v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2021cv00219
Defendant:
Driver for PTS Jane Doe #2, Alan Sielbeck, Driver for PTS Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Demond T. Brady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luevano v. Yeakel
as 20-50969
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jaime Luevano
Defendant / Appellee:
Judge Lee Yeakel, Governor Greg Abbott and Warden Amanda Campbell
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01069
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
BMB Dining Services (Fuqua), Inc. v. The Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission et al
as 4:2020cv02499
Plaintiff:
BMB Dining Services (Fuqua), Inc. d/b/a Bombshells Houston-South and BMB Dining Services (Fuqua), Inc. doing business as Bombshells Houston-South
Defendant:
The Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission, A. Bentley Nettles and Governor Greg Abbott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Abbott et al
as 4:2020cv02393
Defendant:
UTMB Health, Governor Greg Abbott, Dir of TDCJ Exec. Di Bryan Collier and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fleming v. Huntsville Parole Panel et al
as 4:2020cv01789
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, David Gutierrez, Governor Greg Abbott and others
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Fleming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodards v. Abbott et al
as 1:2020cv00099
Defendant:
Law Enforcement, Ted Cruz, Gregg Abbott and others
Plaintiff:
Tre Von A Woodards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
