Cases 1 - 10 of 1,012
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Delva et al v. Graham et al
as 1:2024cv01848
Plaintiff:
Manel Delva and Annia Delva
Defendant:
Ghanell Nia Graham and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Blankenbaker v. Palella
as 1:2024cv01603
Plaintiff:
Graham Blankenbaker
Defendant:
Salvatore Palella
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 294 Breach of Contract
Trammell v. The City of Rochester et al
as 6:2024cv06116
Plaintiff:
Andrew Trammell
Defendant:
The City Of Rochester, Adam Johnson, Cortney Carbonel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Vayani v. 146 West 29th Street Owners Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Abdul Khaliq Vayani
Defendant:
146 West 29th Street Owners Corporation, Berik Management, Managing 146 Building, President Rikin Sheth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fl Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Graham III v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Sherman Graham III
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Graham v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv10805
Plaintiff:
Neicha L. Graham
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
