Cases 1 - 10 of 126
Graham v. Artrip et al
as 7:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Tommy James Graham, Jr.
Defendant:
J. Artrip, Thompson, Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacques v. Staff Members at U.S.P. Lee et al
as 7:2023cv00769
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jacques
Defendant:
Staff Members at U.S.P. Lee, A.W. Waughan, Lt. D. Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
L.M. et al v. Graham et al
as 1:2023cv01574
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Defendant:
Jonathan Graham, Michelle Smith, John Doe #4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McArthur v. Venture Global LNG, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01147
Plaintiff:
Graham McArthur and Scott Kicker
Defendant:
Venture Global LNG, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00845
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00822
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Graham v. City of Fredericksburg, VA
as 3:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
Markus Graham
Defendant:
City of Fredericksburg, VA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Family Medical Leave Act
Ralston v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00348
Plaintiff:
Andy L. Ralston
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Barry Marano, Kyle Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Massey et al
as 2:2023cv00255
Plaintiff:
Jerome D. Graham, Sr.
Defendant:
Judge Massey, Chief Judge Devon R. Paige, Judge Robert M. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
