Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Murphy v. National Grange Mutual Insurance Company
as 1:2013cv11363
Plaintiff:
Janice Murphy
Defendant:
National Grange Mutual Insurance Company
Counter_claimant:
National Grange Mutual Insurance Company
Counter_defendant:
Janice Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Clifton Street, LLC et al v. National Grange Mutual Insurance Company
as 3:2013cv30062
Plaintiff:
Clifton Street, LLC and Johncarlo Woodworking, Inc.
Defendant:
National Grange Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053 Breach of Insurance Contract
Illinois Union Insurance Company v. Contractors Network, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv11480
Plaintiff:
Illinois Union Insurance Company
Defendant:
Contractors Network, Inc., National Grange Mutual Insurance Company, Eastern Exterior Wall Systems, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Harleysville Insurance Company
Cross_defendant:
Colony Drywall, Inc. and Contractors Network, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Preferred Mutual Insurance Company v. Drago General Contracting Corp. et al
as 1:2009cv10508
Plaintiff:
Preferred Mutual Insurance Company and Preferred Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Drago General Contracting Corp. and National Grange Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
National Grange Mutual Insurance Company v. Gimbel
as 1:2007cv11749
Plaintiff:
National Grange Mutual Insurance Company and National Grange Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Phyllis Gimbel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Farahani et al v. Supreme Judicial Court of the State of Massachusetts
as 1:2007cv10251
Plaintiff:
Ghodrat Farahani, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and Ghodrat Farahani
Defendant:
Supreme Judicial Court of the State of Massachusetts, Bristol County Superior Court for the States of Massachusetts, Appeals Court for the State of Massachusetts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
