Cases 41 - 50 of 87
James McConico, Jr. v. Grantt Culliver, et al
as 10-11012
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES MCCONICO, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
GRANTT CULLIVER, TROY KING and RICHARD ALLEN
Nkosi Dubose v. Grant Culliver, et al
as 10-10753
Petitioner - Appellant:
NKOSI A. DUBOSE
Respondent - Appellee:
GRANTT CULLIVER and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA
Jones v. Culliver et al
as 1:2009cv00835
Plaintiff:
Anthony N. Jones
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver, Doctor Barnes, Donny Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bey v. Allen et al
as 4:2009cv02425
Plaintiff:
Richard Wayne Wright Bey, Sr
Defendant:
Richard Allen, James DeLoach, Gwendolyn Mosley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. Culliver et al
as 1:2009cv00780
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Dawson
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver, Richard Allen, Mr. Capshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Dunford et al
as 1:2009cv00641
Plaintiff:
Jason Wesley Chapman
Defendant:
COI Dunford, Grantt Culliver, Holman Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Culliver et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2009cv00817
Plaintiff:
Jason Wesley Chapman
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver, Holman Correctional Facility and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. Wilford et al
as 1:2009cv00517
Plaintiff:
Ricky Crawford
Defendant:
Mr. Wilford, Don Gillgrest, Dr. Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McLeod v. Culliver (INMATE 3)
as 1:2009cv00714
Plaintiff:
Jackie McLeod
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pruitt v. Culliver et al
as 1:2009cv00435
Plaintiff:
Leviticus Pruitt
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver, Tyrone Jenkins, Michael Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
