Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Western Watersheds Project, et al v. Ester McCullough, et al
as 23-15259
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, WILDLANDS DEFENSE, GREAT BASIN RESOURCE WATCH and others
Plaintiff:
BARTELL RANCH LLC and EDWARD BARTELL
Intervenor Plaintiff:
RENO-SPARKS INDIAN COLONY, BURNS PAIUTE TRIBE and ATSA KOODAKUH WYH NUWU PEOPLE OF RED MOUNTAIN
Defendant / Appellee:
ESTER M. MCCULLOUGH, District Manager, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
LITHIUM NEVADA CORPORATION
Burns Paiute Tribe, et al v. Ester McCullough, et al
as 23-15261
Plaintiff:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, WILDLANDS DEFENSE, GREAT BASIN RESOURCE WATCH and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BURNS PAIUTE TRIBE, RENO-SPARKS INDIAN COLONY and ATSA KOODAKUH WYH NUWU PEOPLE OF RED MOUNTAIN
Defendant / Appellee:
ESTER M. MCCULLOUGH, District Manager, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
LITHIUM NEVADA CORPORATION
Bartell Ranch LLC, et al v. Ester McCullough, et al
as 23-15262
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARTELL RANCH LLC and EDWARD BARTELL
Plaintiff:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, WILDLANDS DEFENSE, GREAT BASIN RESOURCE WATCH and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
RENO-SPARKS INDIAN COLONY, BURNS PAIUTE TRIBE and ATSA KOODAKUH WYH NUWU PEOPLE OF RED MOUNTAIN
Defendant / Appellee:
ESTER M. MCCULLOUGH, District Manager, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
LITHIUM NEVADA CORPORATION
Reno-Sparks Indian Colony, et al v. Ester McCullough, et al
as 22-15059
Plaintiff:
BARTELL RANCH LLC, EDWARD BARTELL, WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
RENO-SPARKS INDIAN COLONY, BURNS PAIUTE TRIBE and ATSA KOODAKUH WYH NUWU PEOPLE OF RED MOUNTAIN
Defendant / Appellee:
ESTER M. MCCULLOUGH, District Manager, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
LITHIUM NEVADA CORPORATION
Western Watersheds Project et al v. Bureau of Land Management of the U.S. Department of the Interior et al
as 3:2021cv00103
Plaintiff:
Great Basin Resource Watch, Western Watersheds Project, Basin and Range Watch and others
Defendant:
Bureau of Land Management of the U.S. Department of the Interior, Department of Interior and Ester M. McCullough
Intervenor Defendant:
Lithium Nevada Corp.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Earthworks, et al v. DOI, et al
as 20-5382
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Western Shoshone Defense Project, Save the Scenic Santa Ritas, High Country Citizens' Alliance and others
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of the Interior, United States Forest Service, United States Bureau of Land Management and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Barrick North America Holding Corporation, Round Mountain Gold Corporation, Abx Financeco Inc. and others
Great Basin Resource Watch, et al v. US DOI, et al
as 3:2019cv00661
Defendant:
Jon D. Sherve, United States Department of Interior, Casey Hammond and others
Plaintiff:
Great Basin Resource Watch and Western Shoshone Defense Project
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Great Basin Resource Watch, et al v. BLM, et al
as 14-16812
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREAT BASIN RESOURCE WATCH and WESTERN SHOSHONE DEFENSE PROJECT
Defendant - Appellee:
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, AMY LUEDERS, BLM State Director and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
EUREKA MOLY, LLC
In re: Idaho Conservation League, et al
as 14-1149
In Re - Petitioner:
In re: Idaho Conservation League, Earthworks, Sierra Club and others
Great Basin Resource Watch et al v. US Bureau of Land Management et al
as 3:2013cv00078
Defendant:
Amy Lueders, Christopher J. Cook, US Bureau of Land Management and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Eureka Moly, LLC
Plaintiff:
Great Basin Resource Watch and Western Shoshone Defense Project
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 181 Environment: Review of Agency Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
