Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Malka Leeal v. NewRez LLC, et al
as 22-1917
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MALKA LEEAL
Defendant / Appellee:
NEWREZ LLC, dba Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION and DITECH FINANCIAL LLC, fka Green Tree Servicing, LLC
Mati Leeal, et al v. Ditech Financial LLC
as 20-1639
Defendant / Appellee:
DITECH FINANCIAL LLC, fka Green Tree Servicing, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MALKA LEEAL and MATI LEEAL
In re: Green Tree Servicing, LLC
as 17-306
Petitioner:
In re: GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC
Respondent:
BRIAN GEARY and CONNIE GEARY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-3696
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ladesha Thomas-Wilson v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC, et al
as 16-6541
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LADESHA THOMAS-WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC and FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, aka Fannie Mae
Shirley Rhynes v. Bank of America, et al
as 16-5202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHIRLEY RHYNES-HAWKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON and others
Sheila Whitmore, et al v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC
as 15-6007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHEILA WHITMORE and ANTHONY WHITMORE
Defendant - Appellee:
GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-3417
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ted Gagacki v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC
as 15-1330
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TED S GAGACKI
Defendant - Appellee:
GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC
Angela Copeland v. Bank of America Corporation, et al
as 14-1547
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANGELA COPELAND
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
