Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Cosby v. Ciolli, et al
as 24-1167
Petitioner:
GREGORY D. COSBY, AKA Gregory D. Crosby
Respondent:
M. BANUELOS, DHO Officer, A. CIOLLI, Warden, J. POTTER, Correctional Officer and others
Crosby (PS) v. Ciolli et al
as 1:2024cv01128
Petitioner:
Gregory D. Crosby and Gregory D. Cosby
Respondent:
A. Ciolli and Fed. Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cosby v. Ciolli, et al
as 24-1146
Petitioner:
GREGORY D. COSBY, a/k/a Gregory D. Crosby
Respondent:
A. CIOLLI, Warden, AW PROGRAMS COMPLEX, CMC COMPLEX and others
United States v. Crosby
as 24-3018
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GREGORY D. CROSBY
Cosby v. Cillio, et al
as 23-1100
Petitioner / Appellant:
GREGORY D. COSBY, AKA Gregory D. Crosby
Respondent / Appellee:
A. CILLIO, Warden, DITO BANELOOS, Lt., Officer and J. HOLBROOK, Correctional Counselor
United States v. Crosby
as 23-3034
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GREGORY D. CROSBY
Cosby v. Ciolli et al
as 1:2022cv03119
Petitioner:
Gregory D Cosby, Gregory D Cosmo Crosby and Gregory D Crosby
Respondent:
A. Ciolli, AW Programs Complex, CMC Complex and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cosby v. Warden ADX, et al
as 22-1407
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY D. COSBY, AKA Gregory D. Crosby, AKA Gregory D. Cosmo Cosby
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN ADX, WARDEN USP HIGH, COMPLAX AW (PROGRAMS) and others
Cosby v. ADX et al
as 1:2022cv02531
Plaintiff:
Gregory D. Cosby, Gregory D Crosby and Gregory D. Cosmo Cosby
Defendant:
ADX, USP HGH, Complex AW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crosby v. True, et al
as 22-1231
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY D. CROSBY, AKA Gregory D. Cosby, AKA Gregory D. Cosmo Cosby
Defendant / Appellee:
BILL TRUE, Warden ADX, FCC ADX AWCS PROGRAMS, CMCL COORDINATOR ADX and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
