Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Gregory Hardy v. City of Flint, MI, et al
as 23-1773
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY HARDY
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF FLINT, MI, The City, Individually and Officially, Jointly and Severally, JOHN AND JANE DOES, Individually and Officially, Jointly and Severally, OFFICER A. ESSIX, #802 and others
Defendant:
DISPATCHER, Operator 27, Individually and Officially, Jointly and Severally and SUPERVISOR, Individually and Officially, Jointly and Severally
Hardy v. Mass Transit Authority et al
as 4:2023cv10447
Plaintiff:
Gregory Hardy
Defendant:
Mass Transit Authority, Marie Stewart and John Doe
Hardy v. City of Flint et al
as 2:2022cv11351
Plaintiff:
Gregory Hardy
Defendant:
City of Flint, Dispatcher, John Doe and others
Hardy v. Lansing Police Department et al
as 1:2020cv01224
Plaintiff:
Gregory Hardy
Defendant:
Christie Chiles, Jameil Bakri, Lansing Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardy v. Johnston et al
as 1:2020cv00649
Defendant:
Bill Johnston, Todd Camp, William Braun and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Hardy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HARDY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv03205
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
GREGORY HARDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARDY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv00907
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
GREGORY HARDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HALL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03076
Plaintiff:
NATHAN THOMAS, TONY CAMPBELL, JAMES HARTSON and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hall et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02074
Plaintiff:
Nathan Thomas, Tony Campbell, James Hartson and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
