Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Daniel v. David et al
as 3:2019cv00068
Plaintiff:
Christopher Daniel
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice and Warden Gregory S. David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patrick Ghosh v. Gregory David, et al
as 17-10844
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK ARVIND GHOSH
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGORY S. DAVID, Warden, TIMOTHY R. WASHINGTON, Captain, GLEN D. STOUDER, Unit Grievance Investigator and others
Shelton v. King et al
as 2:2016cv00224
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Marks Shelton
Defendant:
Timothy A King, H Gratz, Erion J Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raburn v. Grant et al
as 2:2016cv00220
Plaintiff:
Jack Cody Raburn
Defendant:
Nikelle D Grant, Daniel J Pacheco, Stephanie L Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ghosh v. David et al
as 2:2016cv00173
Plaintiff:
Patrick Arvind Ghosh
Defendant:
Gregory S David, Timothy R Washington, Glen D Stouder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Gaither v. Gregory David, et al
as 16-11107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER LEE GAITHER
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGORY S. DAVID, Assistant Warden, RAY D. CRUZ, Captain, GENE W. SMITH, Captain and others
Hanson v. Martin et al
as 2:2015cv00241
Plaintiff:
Dale Ray Hanson
Defendant:
Barry L Martin, James R Beach, Gregory S David and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. Steplens
as 2:2015cv00124
Plaintiff:
David Allen Kelly
Defendant:
William Steplens, Barry L Martin, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaither v. Cruz et al
as 2:2015cv00104
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Gaither
Defendant:
Gregory S David, Ray D Cruz, Gene W Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Coleman v. Alfreda Carrieon, et al
as 15-10187
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ARICK COLEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT ALFREDA D. CARRIEON, JULIE M. EVANS, SERGEANT BRYAN W. ADAMS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
