Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Valenzuela v. The United States of America Do not docket in this case. File only in 4:20cr00026-14.
as 4:2023cv04390
Petitioner:
Gustavo Gomez Valenzuela
Respondent:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Corona Gonzalez v. Garland
as 21-60646
Petitioner:
Aida Corona Gonzalez, Kenneth Gomez Corona, Alan Gustavo Gomez Corona and others
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Rodriguez et al v. Al Horno Lean Mexican Kitchen 57 Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02115
Defendant:
Al Horno Lean Mexican Kitchen 57 Inc., Evelyn Doe, Ivan Gomez and others
Plaintiff:
Jesus Rodriguez, Melvin Gustavo Gomez Ramirez and Rocael Arturo Baten Miranda
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gomez v. United States Of America
as 1:2019cv25214
Defendant:
United States Of America
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv23869
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Norman v. Stallings et al
as 1:2019cv00773
Defendant:
Joshua Chafin, LaMarcus Stallings and Gustavo Gomez
Plaintiff:
Ishmel Norman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gomez v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00694
Petitioner:
Gustavo Gomez
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gustavo Gomez v. State of California
as 2:2018cv07041
Petitioner:
Gustavo Gomez
Respondent:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv23040
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Gustavo Gomez v. California Board of Parole
as 2:2017cv04087
Petitioner:
Gustavo Gomez
Respondent:
California Board of Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
