Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Gwendolyn Hall v. George Gascon et al
as 2:2024cv06551
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Hall
Defendant:
John W. Holcomb, Luz Luna, Darlene Hampton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hall v. Wray, et al.
as 24-4507
Defendant:
Attorney General MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL and FBI Director CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Gwendolyn Hall v. Christopher Wray et al
as 2:2024cv06014
Defendant:
Attorney General Merrick Garland and FBI Director Christopher A. Wray
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gwendolyn Hall v. Pasadena Fire Dept Tony Zee et al
as 2:2024cv05850
Defendant:
Pasadena Fire Dept Tony Zee
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hall v. California Victim of Crime Compensation Board, et al.
as 24-3751
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA VICTIM OF CRIME COMPENSATION BOARD, CHAD AUGUSTIN, Pasadena Fire Chief, LINDSEY REED, Director of the Woman Room and others
Hall v. Estrada, et al.
as 24-3683
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
US Attorney MARTIN ESTRADA, UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT and others
Hall v. Jomsky, et al.
as 24-3637
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
MARK JOMSKY, City Clerk, MIGUEL MARQUEZ, City Manager, PASADENA FIRE DEPARTMENT and others
Hall v. Rosenberg, et al.
as 24-3580
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
Magistrate Judge ALICIA G. ROSENBERG, MAGISTRATE JUDGE, OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, DISTRICT JUDGE, Attorney CAREE HARPER, ATTORNEY, Civil Rights Attorney and others
Gwendolyn Hall v. California Victim of Crime Compensation Board et al
as 2:2024cv04652
Defendant:
Hasting Ranch Branch Library, The Pasadena Fire Chief Chad Augustin, Lindsey Reed Director of the Woman Room and others
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
