Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Parviz v. Barron, et al.
as 24-4709
Petitioner:
MAHSA PARVIZ
Respondent:
COLETTE S. PETERS, Director, Bureau of Prisons, H. Barron, C. Peters and others
Parviz v. Barron, et al.
as 24-1315
Respondent:
HOWARD C. BARRON, Warden, Federal Detention Center Sea Tac, COLETTE S. PETERS, Director, Bureau of Prisons, H. Barron and others
Petitioner:
MAHSA PARVIZ
Fakih v. Barron et al
as 2:2023cv01442
Petitioner:
Abdallah Fakih
Respondent:
H. Barron and C. Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Parviz v. Barron et al
as 2:2023cv01407
Petitioner:
Mahsa Parviz
Respondent:
H Barron and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Espinoza v. Barron et al
as 2:2023cv00967
Petitioner:
jacqueline espinoza
Respondent:
H. Barron, C. Peters, H Barron and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hernandez v. Barron et al
as 2:2023cv00968
Petitioner:
Samantha Hernandez
Respondent:
H. Barron, C. Peters, H Barron and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Patel v. Barron et al
as 2:2023cv00937
Petitioner:
Ashokkumar Patel
Respondent:
H. Barron, C. Peters, H Barron and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
David Gambino v. Bobby Meeks, et al
as 17-1813
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID A. GAMBINO
Defendant - Appellee:
BOBBY L. MEEKS, H. BARRON, ASSISTANT WARDEN, VAN HORN, HEALTH ADMINISTRATOR and others
David Gambino v. Bobby Meeks, et al
as 16-3394
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID A. GAMBINO
Defendant - Appellee:
BOBBY L. MEEKS, Warden, H. BARRON, VAN HORN, Health Administrator and others
David Gambino v. Warden McKean FCI, et al
as 15-1149
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID A. GAMBINO
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN MCKEAN FCI, H. BARRON, Assistant Warden, VAN HORN, Health Administrator and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.