Cases 1 - 10 of 59
(PC) Adkins v. Jones et al
as 2:2024cv03794
Defendant:
D. Potts, J. Schultz, H. Moseley and others
Plaintiff:
DuPree Lamont Adkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. French et al
as 3:2024cv08714
Defendant:
Lomeli, Governor G. Newsom, Trent Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Daronta T. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calvin Maron Robinson v. S. Gates et al
as 2:2024cv09590
Defendant:
D. Sumule, S. Gates, M. Fernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin Maron Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Gates et al
as 5:2024cv07412
Defendant:
C. Zapatra, S. Gates, E. Burla and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin Maron Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Vrh v. Gordian et al
as 1:2024cv01248
Defendant:
Manu Bansal, H. Longia, L. Zaragoza and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Vrh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mondragon v. Palafox, et al.
as 24-5842
Defendant:
K. HUFFMAN, A.W., individual and official capacity, A. PALAFOX, Lieutenant, individual and official capacity and H. MOSELEY, A.D., individual and official capacity
Plaintiff:
GIANCARLO MONDRAGON
Singleton v. Schuyler et al
as 3:2024cv06547
Plaintiff:
Antron Singleton, Sr.
Defendant:
Warden Charles Schuyler and H. Moseley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Martinez v. Galvin, et al.
as 1:2024cv01079
Defendant:
J. Galvin, D. Burns and H. Moseley
Plaintiff:
Jose Antonio Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Omar Reynoso v. J. Anaya et al
as 2:2024cv07041
Defendant:
M.L., J. Walker, Ms. Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
Omar Reynoso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Giancarlo Mondragon v. A. Palafox et al
as 2:2024cv06395
Defendant:
A.W. K. Huffman, A.D. H. Moseley and Lt. A. Palafox
Plaintiff:
Giancarlo Mondragon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
