Cases 1 - 10 of 37
WILLIAMS, JR. v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2023cv01076
Plaintiff:
ROBERT H. WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC., PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Korn et al
as 1:2021cv01506
Plaintiff:
Elsie H. Williams
Defendant:
Michael A. Korn, USA Truck, Inc. and Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. FEDER
as 2:2021cv01728
Defendant:
MICHAEL A. FEDER
Plaintiff:
CONSTANCE H. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC. v. ARSLAN et al
as 5:2020cv06121
Defendant:
SARGENT & LUNDY LLC, MEHMET ARSLAN, BENJAMIN RENSHAW and others
Plaintiff:
STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC.
WILLIAMS v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2020cv00230
Respondent:
Superintendent BARRY R. SMITH, JOHN E. WETZEL, COUNSELOR GINTER and others
Petitioner:
JAMES H. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Williams v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2020cv01611
Defendant:
Giater, Dorina Varner, Derring and others
Plaintiff:
James H. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tovar-Martinez et al v. Clouser et al
as 4:2020cv01495
Defendant:
Mrs. M. Clouser, Dr. Sage, Mrs. G. and others
Plaintiff:
Jaime Fernando Sanchez, William S. Bearden, Victor Tovar-Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
EMINENT GROUP, INC. v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2019cv00186
Defendant:
SCHUYLER H. WILLIAMS and ACCELALPHA, INC.
Plaintiff:
EMINENT GROUP, INC.
DeWeese v. Shapiro et al
as 1:2018cv01698
Respondent:
Leo L. Dunn, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and Josh Shapiro
Petitioner:
H. William DeWeese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Mission One Educational Staffing Services
as 4:2018cv01271
Plaintiff:
Constance H. Williams
Defendant:
Mission One Educational Staffing Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
