Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv12412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
General Medicine, P.C. et al v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Secretary of
as 2:2022cv11976
Plaintiff:
General Medicine, P.C., City Medical Partners, P.A., General Medicine of North Carolina, P.A. and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Secretary of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2345 Medicare Recovery
Breeze Smoke LLC v. Jarjess et al
as 2:2020cv13413
Defendant:
John Doe 3, Ghazwan Eeso, EZ Smoke Shop 2, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Breeze Smoke LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Woellecke et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2019cv12430
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Committee of the Select Retirement Plan, Plan Administrator of the Salaried Involuntary Reduction Process and others
Plaintiff:
Werner Woellecke and Terry Haggerty, individually and on behalf of similarly situated LL1 through LL5 former Ford Motor Company managers
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv12528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Haggerty Logistics, Inc. v. R2 Logistics, Inc.
as 2:2015cv13881
Plaintiff:
Haggerty Logistics, Inc.
Thirdparty_defendant:
Vela Transport LLC
Defendant:
R2 Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Annabel v. Ericson et al
as 2:2015cv10345
Plaintiff:
Robert Annabel, II
Defendant:
Ericson, Brown, Oden and others
Zavatson v. Warren, City of et al
as 2:2014cv10623
Plaintiff:
Daniel Zavatson
Defendant:
Warren, City of, Donald Seidl, J Dahlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hursey #273259 v. Romanowski et al
as 1:2012cv01403
Plaintiff:
Dashi Hursey #273259
Defendant:
Unknown Romanowski, Unknown Haas, Unknown Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
