Cases 41 - 50 of 4,994
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hampton v. Western Illinois Correctional Center
as 3:2024cv03047
Plaintiff:
Alexander Hampton
Defendant:
Western Illinois Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald Parker v. Nurse C. Boyd
as 24-6201
Plaintiff:
DONALD PARKER
Defendant:
NURSE C. BOYD, NURSE R. MENESES and HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL JAIL
Claud v. Brown Harris Stevens Residential Sales, LLC
as 24-584
Plaintiff:
SHAUNCY CLAUD
Defendant:
BROWN HARRIS STEVENS RESIDENTIAL SALES, LLC and BROWN HARRIS STEVENS OF THE HAMPTONS, LLC
Essex Capital Group, INC v. Warnell, Jr. et al
as 8:2024cv00529
Plaintiff:
ESSEX CAPITAL GROUP, INC
Defendant:
Harold Brooks Warnell, Jr., Kenneth Hampton Warnell, AgSouth Farm Credit, ACA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Parker v. Boyd et al
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Donald Parker
Defendant:
Nurse C. Boyd, Mr. R. Meneses and Hampton Roads Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Applied Minds, LLC v. Guild Hall of East Hampton, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01465
Plaintiff:
Applied Minds, LLC
Defendant:
Guild Hall of East Hampton, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hampton v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Rodrigues C. Hampton
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
TYGER v. HAMPTON MECHANICAL, INC.
as 2:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL B TYGER and RUSSELL B. TYGER
Defendant:
HAMPTON MECHANICAL, INC and HAMPTON MECHANICAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
