Cases
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2024cv50220
Defendant: The State of Illinois, City Of Dixon, Jane Does and others
Plaintiff: Hannibal Eason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2023cv50462
Defendant: AFSCME, Kwame Raoul, J. B. Pritzker and others
Plaintiff: Hannibal Eason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2023cv50352
Petitioner: Hannibal Eason
Respondent: Kwame Raoul, Latoya Hughes and Tarry Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hannibal Eason v. Kwame Raoul, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-3126
Plaintiff / Appellant: HANNIBAL EASON
Defendant / Appellee: KWAME RAOUL, OFFICE OF THE ILLINOIS ATTORNEY GENERAL, KIMBERLY M. FOXX and others
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 1:2022cv00985
Plaintiff: Hannibal Eason
Defendant: Kwame Raoul, Attorney General's Offices of the State of Illinois, The, Kimberly Foxx and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ralph Holmes, et al v. Salvador Godinez We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-2709
Plaintiff / Appellee: GEORGE CHILDRESS, HANNIBAL EASON, BILLY JOHNSON and others
Defendant / Appellant: SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, Acting Director of Illinois Department of Corrections
Ralph Holmes, et al v. Salvador Godinez We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-2236
Plaintiff / Appellee: GEORGE CHILDRESS, HANNIBAL EASON, BILLY JOHNSON and others
Defendant / Appellant: SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, Acting Director of Illinois Department of Corrections
Holmes et al v. Godinez et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv02961
Plaintiff: Ralph Holmes , Daniel Baxter , George Childress and others
Defendant: Salvador A Godinez and Rachel McKinzie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?