Cases 61 - 70 of 107
Francisco Gomez v. Harold Clarke
as 20-6078
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director
Petitioner / Appellant:
FRANCISCO GOMEZ
Lamont Woods v. Harold Clarke
as 20-6107
Petitioner / Appellant:
LAMONT A. WOODS
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, VDOC
Edward Saunders v. Harold Clarke
as 19-7745
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDWARD GERMAINE SAUNDERS
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Jamal Gethers v. Harold Clarke
as 19-7523
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMAL NATHAN GETHERS
Michael Gorbey v. Harold Clarke
as 19-7451
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Elevation Clark v. Harold Clarke
as 19-7507
Petitioner / Appellant:
ELEVATION A. CLARK, a/k/a James I. Thomas
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
John Tomikel v. Harold Clarke
as 19-7513
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN RUSSELL TOMIKEL
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Shaquan Fallen v. Harold Clarke
as 19-7440
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
SHAQUAN JAMAR FALLEN
Joshua Moseley v. Harold Clark
as 19-7456
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSHUA CHARLES LOVELL MOSELEY
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARK, Director of the Department of Corrections
Jackie Helms v. Harold Clarke
as 19-7389
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACKIE LEE HELMS
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. NWADKDCHA, Primary Care Physician LCC Lwenburg CC, HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Department of Correction and MS. S. TDOODER, Medical Admininstrator L.C.C.
Defendant:
DR. AMONETT, Head Physician D.D.C. Health Service
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
