Cases 91 - 100 of 110
Paul Thompson, Jr. v. Harold Clarke
as 19-6665
Defendant / Appellee:
C/O J. ROSENBAUM, DOSS, NURSE MS. SHAFFER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL CLEVELAND THOMPSON, JR.
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Johnnie Justice v. Harold Clarke
as 19-6632
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, etc.
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHNNIE LEE JUSTICE
Edward Egan v. Harold Clarke
as 19-6580
Defendant:
ROANOKE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and STEVEN A. MCGRAW, Clerk
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDWARD JAMES EGAN, SR.
Derek Rives v. Harold Clarke
as 19-6512
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEREK RIVES
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Elmuiz Abdu v. Harold Clarke
as 19-6407
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
ELMUIZ ABDU
Eugene Morley v. Harold Clarke
as 19-6386
Petitioner / Appellant:
EUGENE ELLIOTT MORLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Dedric Sherrod v. Harold Clarke
as 19-6364
Respondent / Appellee:
SIR HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEDRIC DEVON SHERROD
Allahteef Jones v. Harold Clarke
as 19-6360
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALLAHTEEF SALAAM JONES
Thelonious Ragin, II v. Harold Clarke
as 19-6261
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
THELONIOUS B. RAGIN, II
Javon Martin v. Harold Clarke
as 19-6210
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Respondent:
BARRY KANOKE, Warden, River North Correctional Center
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAVON LAREN MARTIN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
