Cases 21 - 30 of 107
Steven Calleja, Jr. v. Harold Clark
as 21-6074
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARK, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEVEN PAUL CALLEJA, JR.
Jowarski Nedd v. Harold Clarke
as 21-6026
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOWARSKI RUSSELL NEDD
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
George Brandon v. Harold Clarke
as 20-7833
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
GEORGE BRANDON
Leo Farnsworth v. Melvin Davis
as 20-7686
Defendant / Appellee:
MELVIN DAVIS, Warden, HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of VDOC, BRIAN MORAN, Director/Superintendent of Public Safety for the Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEO BRANDON FARNSWORTH
Walter Booker, Jr. v. Harold Clarke
as 20-7623
Defendant / Appellee:
R. RIDDICK, Postal Assistant, GREGORY HALLOWAY, Eastern Regional Administrator, K. COSBY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALTER DELANEY BOOKER, JR.
Fred Carrington v. Harold Clarke
as 20-7592
Petitioner / Appellant:
FRED M. CARRINGTON
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Department of Corrections
Deandre Johnson v. Rappahannock Regional Jail
as 20-7563
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEANDRE JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections and SUPERINTENDENT RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL JAIL
Brandon Thomas v. Harold Clarke
as 20-7550
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRANDON WAYNE THOMAS
Kalen Nielsen v. Harold Clarke
as 20-7549
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
KALEN JOSEPH NIELSEN
Wesley Earnest v. Keith Davis
as 20-7531
Petitioner / Appellant:
WESLEY BRIAN EARNEST
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director Virginia Department of Corrections and KEITH W. DAVIS, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.