Cases 41 - 50 of 107
Bernard Meeks v. Anne Precythe

as 20-6807
Respondent / Appellee:
ANNE L. PRECYTHE, Director of the Missouri Department of Corrections and MARK R. HERRING, Attorney General of Virginia
Petitioner / Appellant:
BERNARD MEEKS
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Rashee Johnson v. Harold Clarke

as 20-6915
Petitioner / Appellant:
RASHEE DONELL JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Demetrius Holmes v. Harold Clarke

as 20-6779
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEMETRIUS A. HOLMES
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Zachary Wallace v. Harold Clarke

as 20-6466
Petitioner / Appellant:
ZACHARY DONTE WALLACE, a/k/a Zachary Dante Wallace
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director Virginia Department of Corrections
John Crawford v. Harold Clarke

as 20-6430
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN BRADLEY CRAWFORD
Oliver Felix v. Harold Clarke

as 20-6565
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
OLIVER SEIGEFRED FELIX
James King, Jr. v. Harold Clarke

as 20-6429
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES DEWEY KING, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of VA Dept. of Corrections
Leroy Kelly v. Harold Clarke

as 20-6473
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the VA Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
LEROY JOSEPH KELLY
Devon Byrd v. Harold Clarke

as 20-6520
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEVON M. BYRD
Raymond Fitzgerald v. Harold Clarke

as 20-6309
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAYMOND FITZGERALD
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.