Cases 51 - 60 of 110
Devon Byrd v. Harold Clarke
as 20-6520
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEVON M. BYRD
Raymond Fitzgerald v. Harold Clarke
as 20-6309
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAYMOND FITZGERALD
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Franklin Smith v. William O'Brien
as 20-6386
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of (VDOC), WILLIAM R. O'BRIEN, Virginia Beach Circuit Judge and SCOTT FREDERICK HALLAUER, Sentencing & Appeal Attorney
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANKLIN C. SMITH
Melvin Freeman v. Harold Clarke
as 20-6446
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELVIN LEE FREEMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Dominique Hackley v. Harold Clarke
as 20-6324
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
DOMINIQUE ALEXANDER HACKLEY
John Bellamy, Jr. v. Daniel Calhoun, Jr.
as 20-6195
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, F. SHILLING, Director of Health Services, MS. MINTER, Nurse Practitioner and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN WALTER BELLAMY, JR.
Victor Livermon v. Harold Clarke
as 20-6132
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director
Petitioner / Appellant:
VICTOR T. LIVERMON
Clayton Smith v. Harold Clarke
as 20-6140
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
CLAYTON GEORGE SMITH
Trenton Ore v. Harold Clarke
as 20-6092
Petitioner / Appellant:
TRENTON JOSEPH ORE
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Franklin Smith v. Kevin Dailey, et al
as 19-5363
Defendant / Appellee:
William Baggs, A.T.F., Barlow, Sergeant, Tulsa County Jail, Peter J. Mantoni, Officer of Virgnia Beach and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Franklin C. Smith
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
