Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 138
Deandre Johnson v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6272
Petitioner: DEANDRE JOHNSON
Respondent: HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6883
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ormrode Brown v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6438
Petitioner / Appellant: ORMRODE ALLEN BROWN
Respondent / Appellee: HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Ryan Davis v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6435
Petitioner / Appellant: RYAN O'NEAL DAVIS
Respondent / Appellee: HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Raymond Ford, Jr. v. Ralph Northam
as 23-6410
Plaintiff / Appellant: RAYMOND ALEXANDER FORD, JR.
Defendant / Appellee: RALPH NORTHAM, Governor of Virginia (Former), GLENN YOUNGKIN, Governor of Virginia (Present), HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections (VDOC) and others
Hunter Collins v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6342
Petitioner / Appellant: HUNTER D. COLLINS
Respondent / Appellee: HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Richard Baber, Jr. v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6280
Petitioner / Appellant: RICHARD L. BABER, JR.
Respondent / Appellee: HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Gregory Gary v. Harold Clarke
as 22-7304
Petitioner / Appellant: GREGORY TYRONE GARY, a/k/a Gregory Tyrone Gary-Bey
Respondent / Appellee: HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections and JEFFERY B. KISER, Warden, Red Onion State Prison
Markese Jones v. Harold Clarke
as 22-7012
Petitioner / Appellant: MARKESE LAMOND JONES
Respondent / Appellee: HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Shavis Holloman v. Harold Clarke
as 22-6603
Petitioner / Appellant: SHAVIS HOLLOMAN
Respondent / Appellee: HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?