Cases 1 - 10 of 12
BAILEY et al v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17599
Plaintiff:
MARVIN EUGENE BAILEY and HEATHER BAILEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROBERT MARTIN, as Conservator for DARLENE MARTIN, a Protected Person v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv11845
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, LT. MICHAEL NELSON, SGT. EARL FISHER and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MARTIN, as Conservator for DARLENE MARTIN, a Protected Person
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cottman v. Carespring, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00170
Plaintiff:
Rodney Cottman
Defendant:
Carespring, Inc., John Muller, Heather Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bailey v. Golden State Foods Corp. et al
as 4:2014cv01631
Plaintiff:
Heather Bailey
Defendant:
Golden State Foods Corp. and David Lax
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joel Carter v. Ricumstrict, et al
as 13-1516
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOEL CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL KRAJNIK, Resident Unit Manager, DALE HUGHES, aka R Huges, SMITH, Lieutenant and others
Joel Carter v. Ricumstrict, et al
as 13-1518
Plaintiff:
JOEL CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD RICUMSTRICT, Assistant Deputy Warden to Housing, MICHAEL KRAJNIK, Resident Unit Manager, DALE HUGHES, aka R Huges and others
Underwood v. Heyns et al
as 2:2012cv15679
Plaintiff:
Travis Underwood
Defendant:
Daniel Heyns, David Bergh, Jeffrey Stieve and others
Carmichael v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 2:2012cv13594
Plaintiff:
Karlos Carmichael
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Nick Ludwick, Scott L Holmes and others
Randy Haynes v. Keith Ivens, et al
as 10-1240
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY M. HAYNES
Defendant - Appellee:
KEITH IVENS, JEFFREY STIEVE, JOHN DOES and others
Bailey v. Aimco Chelsea Ridge, LLC et al
as 7:2010cv01600
Plaintiff:
Heather Bailey
Defendant:
Aimco Chelsea Ridge, LLC and Chelsea Ridge NY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
